The Healthcare Sector: It’s Not Like Other Services



Healthcare costs in the United States represent a significant proportion of consumer as well as aggregate spending (i.e., GDP). Yet, there is relatively little research that in marketing considers decision making and inferences about service in actual healthcare contexts. We propose that aspects of the decision-making process and subsequent choices in the healthcare sector make it fundamentally different than other consumer services, rendering our existing frameworks inadequate to address healthcare decisions. Our group—which consists of behavioral researchers from marketing and social psychology as well as behavioral operations management and patient-facing and research-based physicians—will explore the process of choosing physicians, the relationship that unfolds once a provider is chosen, and other unique contexts surrounding this process. Patients are now actively encouraged to choose their healthcare provider as demand-driven healthcare is expected to create competition between providers. We plan to explore key areas where our existing frameworks in marketing are underspecified—including assumptions of transparency in relation to attributes relevant to the decision (e.g., pricing, wait times, etc.), the nature of emotions in the decision making process (e.g., worry, confusion, or even feeling stigmatized from having certain conditions), and the role of demographics (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity) in the choice process. The goal of our session is to discuss and outline these and other factors to capture where traditional models fail to accommodate the complexity of decision making in this context, and to outline directions for future research based on potential solutions aimed to help consumers to navigate the complexity in healthcare decision making.


Track Leaders

Stacey Finkelstein
Stacey Finkelstein is an Associate Professor of Marketing at the College of Business at Stony Brook University. She received her PhD and MBA from the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business (2011). Her research has been published in Journal of Consumer Research, Psycholgical Science, Management Science, Journal of Business Ethics, Appetite, just to name a few. She is currently on the Editorial Review Board (ERB) of the Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Journal of Consumer Affairs, and Appetite. She was on the ERB for the Journal of Consumer Research from 2016-2018.
Beth Vallen

Beth Vallen is an Associate Professor of Marketing at the Villanova University School of Business. Beth’s research explores issues related to consumer health and wellness, focusing more specifically on choices made in the presence of various marketing and policy-related stimuli—such as nutrition labels, food menus, food naming conventions, and medical provider policy. Her research has been published in journals including the Journal of Consumer Research, the Journal of Consumer Psychology, and Appetite. Beth was the recipient of the 2013 Marketing and Society Emerging Scholar award from the AMA Marketing and Society SIG, and she currently serves on the editorial review boards for the Journal of Public Policy and Marketing and Journal of Consumer Affairs.

Track Participants

  • Wendy Boland (American University)
  • Marie Yeh (Loyola University)
  • Kristen Feemster (Center for Disease Control)
  • David Rosenthal (Columbia University)
  • Lusine Poghosyan (Columbia University)
  • Nan Liu (Boston College)